IP Federation policy position on protection of design rights following United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union
Policy Papers
Total Documents: 237
This part of the site is up-to-date from 2004; relevant position papers prior to then are obtainable from the Secretariat.
IP Federation policy position on protection for EU trade marks following United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union IP Federation policy position on United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union (updated 20 January 2017) IP Federation policy position on United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union IP Federation comments on EPO Administrative Council paper CA/43/16 outlining proposals for the reform of the EPO Boards of Appeal (BoA) Response to Department for Business, Innovation and Skills open consultation ‘National Innovation Plan: call for ideas’ closing 30 May 2016 IP Federation response to consultation closing 15 April 2016 to help assess the functioning of Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED) in the online environment, with a view to identify the possible need for adapting such provisions and to propose corrective measures IP Federation response to IPO consultation dated 29 February 2016 seeking views on proposed amendments to the Patents Rules 2007 IP Federation observations on the questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office on case G1/15 (Partial priority) IP Federation response to Group B+ questionnaire regarding cross-border aspects of client / patent attorney privilege IP Federation Brexit policy position – protection for EU trade marks
IP Federation Brexit policy position (updated 20 January 2017)
IP Federation Brexit policy position
Reform of the Boards of Appeal
BIS open consultation – National Innovation Plan: call for ideas
Commission consultation on IP enforcement
Consultation – proposed changes to the Patents Rules
Amicus curiae brief on the questions referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal pending as case G1/15
Group B+ questionnaire regarding cross-border aspects of client / patent attorney privilege