Publications


Search

  


Most Recent Publications  

Governance Committee Terms of Reference

European Qualifying Examination (EQE)

Developments in the Patentability of Computer Software and Business Method Inventions

Trends and Events 2010

The Federation's achievements

The Federation on the Web

Draft European Commission Block Exemption Regulation on Research and Development Agreements

Copyright Levies

Trade Marks

Future of Design Law in UK

Review of EU Customs Anti-Counterfeiting Regulation

EU Patent Reform

European Patent Office Single Patent Process (SPP) Programme

Patent Quality

New System for Regulation of UK Lawyers including Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Privilege

The UK Intellectual Property Office

Strategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP)

IP Federation biographies

IP Federation annual report and accounts 31 December 2010

Trends and Events 2011

The Federation's achievements

Draft European Commission Block Exemption Regulation on R&D Agreements

Copyright Levies

Trade marks

Hargreaves Review – Call for Evidence in the Designs Sector

Unintentional Infringement of UK and Community Rights

Commission Consultation on the Enforcement Directive

The European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy

EU Patent Reform

Innovative tools and processes at the European Patent Office

Practical issues – selecting an expert and getting the best out of them

Preliminary injunctions alive and well – a view from Europe

The Hargreaves Review

The UK Intellectual Property Office and Ipsum

The America Invents Act
Publications Details


Trade Marks

Document No: PUB 5/10
Posted: 14/12/2010

At the behest of the European Commission, a review is being undertaken by the Max Planck Institute into the workings of the Trade Mark Regulation and the Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market. The Federation made submissions through BUSINESSEUROPE on the question relating to what geographical area was sufficient to establish genuine use – maintaining that it was a fundamental precept of the common market that genuine use in a single member state was effectively use throughout the European Union, pointing out that to find otherwise would dis­advantage SME’s. The Federation also opposed a suggestion that 50% of re­newal fees should be given to national offices since we could anticipate that such income would be diverted to purposes not directly connected with Community Trade Marks.

  Click here for Download (Trade Marks.pdf)

Back