Publications


Search

  


Most Recent Publications  

Governance Committee Terms of Reference

European Qualifying Examination (EQE)

Developments in the Patentability of Computer Software and Business Method Inventions

Trends and Events 2010

The Federation's achievements

The Federation on the Web

Draft European Commission Block Exemption Regulation on Research and Development Agreements

Copyright Levies

Trade Marks

Future of Design Law in UK

Review of EU Customs Anti-Counterfeiting Regulation

EU Patent Reform

European Patent Office Single Patent Process (SPP) Programme

Patent Quality

New System for Regulation of UK Lawyers including Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Privilege

The UK Intellectual Property Office

Strategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy (SABIP)

IP Federation biographies

IP Federation annual report and accounts 31 December 2010

Trends and Events 2011

The Federation's achievements

Draft European Commission Block Exemption Regulation on R&D Agreements

Copyright Levies

Trade marks

Hargreaves Review – Call for Evidence in the Designs Sector

Unintentional Infringement of UK and Community Rights

Commission Consultation on the Enforcement Directive

The European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy

EU Patent Reform

Innovative tools and processes at the European Patent Office

Practical issues – selecting an expert and getting the best out of them

Preliminary injunctions alive and well – a view from Europe

The Hargreaves Review

The UK Intellectual Property Office and Ipsum

The America Invents Act

IP Federation annual report and accounts 31 December 2011

Articles of Association 2012

Governance Committee Terms of Reference 2012

Resolutions of the IP Federation Council October 2012

Presidents of the IP Federation

Trends and Events 2012

Additional Employee Inventor Compensation – A right too far?

An Update on the America Invents Act (AIA) and Strategies to Consider

Proposal for Collaborative Search and Examination (CSE) in the PCT

Copyright & Levies

European Patent Office (EPO) Update

EU Patent Reform

IP Federation biographies

Patent Box – The Basics

Revision of the rules for the assessment of licensing agreements for the transfer of technology

Patent Marking

Update on “plain” (more accurately, “standardised”) packaging

Patent Enforcement – Portugal enacts law mandating arbitration for pharmaceutical patent disputes

Reform of the UK Designs Legal Framework

Role of Government in Protecting and promoting Intellectual Property

The Federation's activities

The UK Intellectual Property Office

Trade marks update

Trends and Events 2006-2007

Trends and Events 2002-2003

Trends and Events 2005-2006

Trends and Events 2004-2005

Trends and Events 2003-2004

Trends and Events 2001-2002

Trends and Events 2000-2001

Trends and Events 1999-2000

Trends and Events 1998-1999
Most Recent Publications


  Trends and Events 2012

Document No: PUB 20/12
Posted: 14/02/2013

ISSN 2046-3049

Trends and Events is our annual publication in which the Federation reviews its previous twelve months’ activities. It provides an overview of those IP issues which engaged industry during that period and tries to look beyond current issues to identify future areas of interest, activity or con­troversy.

 

  Additional Employee Inventor Compensation – A right too far?

Document No: PUB 20A/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

The issue of employee inventions and the extent to which employee inventors should be compensated has in recent times become a hot topic in the UK. Since the Patents Act 1977 there has been a statutory right for employees to be awarded additional compensation over and above their salary for patented inventions made by them during the course of their employment where "having regard among other things to the size and nature of the employers undertaking, the invention or the patent for it (or the combination of both) is of outstanding benefit to the employer; and, by reason of those facts it is just" for an award to be made.

 

  An Update on the America Invents Act (AIA) and Strategies to Consider

Document No: PUB 20B/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

The America Invents Act (AIA), the greatest change to American patent law in over 150 years, was enacted in September 2011, but many first-inventor-to-file (FITF) implementing rules were just recently proposed in July 2012, as the US patent system prepares to tran­sition to a first-inventor-to-file (FITF) system on March 16, 2013. In anticipation of this 2013 transi­tion, there are three helpful perspectives with which to view the im­ple­ment­ation of the AIA’s FITF system: (1) the perspective of pre-AIA US patent filings before March 16, 2013; (2) the perspective of post-AIA US patent filings with “effective” filing dates on or after March 16, 2013; and (3) the perspective of transitional US patent filings filed in the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on or after March 16, 2013, but with an “effective” filing date before March 16, 2013. This third perspective takes into account: a US patent application filed on or after March 16, 2013 which claims a benefit of priority under the Paris Convention to an earlier filed non-US application; and/or a US patent ap­pli­ca­tion filed on or after March 16, 2013 as a National Stage application of a PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applica­tion filed before March 16, 2013. Understanding the proper “perspective” which applies to each US patent ap­plica­tion filing will be critical to building a strong US patent portfolio as the perspective will impact, for example, the scope of relevant prior art and attendant duty to disclose information to the USPTO, and an appropriate claim drafting strategy.
 

  Proposal for Collaborative Search and Examination (CSE) in the PCT

Document No: PUB 20C/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

Collaborative search and examination (CSE) has been the subject of prolonged support by the Federation, beginning with a presentation by a Vice-President in June 2007 at an international Colloquium on Patent Quality in Amsterdam, and in 2012 involving con­tribu­tions by the President at similar events in London and Warsaw. Since 2010, support for CSE has been given also by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which has been valuable because of ICC’s relationship with WIPO.
 

  Copyright & Levies

Document No: PUB 20D/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

In December 2011, the Government published proposals for implementing a number of the recommendations relating to copyright which it had accepted in its August 2011 response to the Hargreaves Review of IP and Growth. Simultaneously Baroness Wilcox, the IP minister at the time, launched a Government consultation seeking views on these proposals.

 

  European Patent Office (EPO) Update

Document No: PUB 20E/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

Users welcomed a slowing of the pace of amendment of the European Patent Convention (EPC) itself, as the EPO digests the ramifications of previous changes. This did not mean that the EPO rested on its laurels in 2012 and in other areas it was active in ways that users welcome, such as the innovations in the area of machine translations.

 

  EU Patent Reform

Document No: PUB 20F/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

In 2012, the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) dossier has been among the Federation’s highest priorities, with major developments notwithstanding the breakdown of negotiations at the Competitiveness Council meeting in Warsaw in December 2011 over the location of the Central Division of the UPC.

 

  IP Federation biographies

Document No: PUB 20G/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

Dr Bobby Mukherjee is a qualified UK and European Patent Attorney with over 16 years’ experience of IP work gained in private practice and at BAE Systems plc. He is currently the Chief Counsel – IP & Technology Law, BAE Systems. He has represented his current employer on the Patents Committee and Council of the IP Federation for some of those years.

 

  Revision of the rules for the assessment of licensing agreements for the transfer of technology

Document No: PUB 20H/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

On 6 December 2011, the European Commission launched a public consultation for the revision of the current framework for the assessment of technology transfer agreements, including the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) and its corresponding Notice, scheduled to expire in April 2014.

 

  Patent Box – The Basics

Document No: PUB 20I/12
Posted: 08/03/2013

If you pay UK corporation tax and develop your own products but still haven’t taken a look at the Patent Box, you really should. From April 2013, companies which satisfy specific criteria will be able to claim an additional deduction against their taxable profits, effectively taking the tax rate applied to a proportion of their profits down to 10%. There will be some companies for whom the new Patent Box will make no difference at all but, equally, there will be some for whom it will offer a relatively easy way of reducing their tax burden.

 


  Prev    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next