Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Latest Activities


IPReg consultation on the examination system for qualifying as a patent attorney

17 March 2014

The IP Federation has submitted a response to the IPReg consultation on simplifying and modernising the examination system for qualifying as a patent attorney with a closing date of 17 March 2014. Our conclusions are as follows:

  • We believe that the proposal to abandon the Foundation Level examina­tions is misguided. We strongly object to the proposal to abolish papers P3 and P4. Im­plementation of either of these proposals, it is believed, may have a serious impact on diversity within the UK patent attorney profession; and, in the case of the abolishing of P3 and P4, we have a specific and, as far as we are aware, as yet unaddressed concern that IPReg would be removing crucial elements of its ability to fulfil its own regulatory objectives.
  • We encourage IPReg to withdraw these proposals, and instead review the quali­fication system within the UK in a holistic manner, defining firstly the purposes of the UK qualification to enable potential future changes to be made that are consistent with the needs of the public, the needs of the profession, and indeed IPReg’s own objectives as defined by the Legal Services Board.
  • We strongly urge IPReg to reconsider the proposed minimum time service before qualification and the proposed STEM degree requirement. We further support provision of a clear statement of skills and competency requirements for the training and qualification of patent attorneys within the profession.

For full details, click HERE.

To see all our policy papers, click HERE.



Previous Articles

  • IP Federation comments on the proposed EU trade secrets directive 

    The IP Federation has issued a policy paper stating its position on... 
    (February 26, 2014) read more »»
     
  • Intellectual Property Bill 201314: criminal sanctions for Unregistered Design Rights 

    The IP Federation has issued a policy paper stating its position on... 
    (February 19, 2014) read more »»
     
  • Intellectual Property Bill 201314: Second Reading 

    The IP Federation, along with CIPA (the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys)... 
    (January 23, 2014) read more »»
     
  • Court of Justice case C-539/13 (Merck v Sigma) 

    The IP Federation is urging UK intervention at the Court of Justice of the European... 
    (December 20, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Trends and Events 2013 

    The annual newsletter in which the Federation reviews its previous twelve months’... 
    (December 03, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Intellectual Property Bill 201314: IP Federation position on Clause 3 (qualification criteria) 

    The IP Federation has issued a policy paper in response to the qualification... 
    (October 25, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Intellectual Property Bill 201314: Clause 18 (sharing information with overseas patent offices) 

    The IP Federation has issued a policy paper in response to the provisions... 
    (October 21, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Intellectual Property Bill 201314: IP Federation position on Clause 13 

    The IP Federation has issued a further policy paper in response to the... 
    (October 09, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Public consultation on the Rules of Procedure for the Unified Patent Court 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the public consultation on the... 
    (September 30, 2013) read more »»
     
  • Commission proposal to amend Brussels I Regulation to UPC Agreement 

    The IP Federation has prepared comments on the Commission proposal... 
    (September 23, 2013) read more »»