Subscribe to our RSS Feed

Latest Activities


Unitary Patent Regulation and Unified Patent Court Agreement

30 May 2012

The IP Federation has written to Kerstin Jorna at DG MARKT highlighting the Federation’s concerns about the present proposals for the Unified Patent Court. Among other things, this makes the following points:

Articles 6-8
We see nothing to require or commend the involvement of the ECJ, and are strongly urging for their deletion from the Regulation. 

Bifurcation
The Federation sees the prospect of bifurcation in the UPC as being wholly bad for European business. It would reduce external investment, and put European industry at a disadvantage as compared with non-European business. It would also distort competition within the internal market. Making bifurcation an option under the new system is not an answer, but actually will make matters worse by distorting the focus of patent litigation and centring it in those countries which routinely opt to bifurcate, thereby attracting patent owners to bring their infringement actions there. We therefore are urging for bifurcation to be excluded from the system entirely.

For full details, click HERE.

To see all our policy papers, click HERE.



Previous Articles

  • Proposed Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court 

    The IP Federation has written to the Prime Minister pleading for more discussions... 
    (May 21, 2012) read more »»
     
  • The Unified Patent Court: help or hindrance? 

    The IP Federation’s contributions are mentioned ten times in the report... 
    (May 03, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Rules of Procedure for the Unified Patent Court 

    The IP Federation has submitted comments on the first draft of the Rules of... 
    (April 23, 2012) read more »»
     
  • European Patent Reform Proposals 

    Following the IPO’s European Patent Reform Consultation meeting Monday... 
    (April 05, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Role of Government in Protecting and promoting Intellectual Property 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the All-Party Intellectual Property... 
    (March 30, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Consultation on copyright following the Hargreaves Review 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the consultation seeking views... 
    (March 20, 2012) read more »»
     
  • IPReg Second Consultation on Litigators’ Rights 

    The IP Federation has submitted a response to the IPReg Second Consultation... 
    (March 16, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Administrative Assistant vacancy 

    Administrative Assistant vacancy – Hatton Garden, London EC1 Part-time... 
    (March 08, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Court of Justice Case C-661/11 (Martin y Paz Diffusion SA v. David Depuydt and Fabriek van Maroquine 

    The IP Federation is urging UK intervention in Court of Justice Case C-661/11... 
    (February 16, 2012) read more »»
     
  • Observations on Court of Justice cases 

    The President of the IP Federation has written to the Head of EC Litigation... 
    (February 08, 2012) read more »»